Stockton will be participating in the in-person National Model UN (NMUN) conference April 10-14, 2022 in New York City. Click here for more information about the conference including location, the weekly schedule, and hotel details.
SUGGESTED DEADLINE: Monday December 20th. Applications will continue to be accepted through Friday January 21st.
The Following Conditions and Requirements Apply:
- Be fully vaccinated. Students who have an approved vaccine exemption cannot travel to New York City per local NYC regulations and Stockton travel policy.
- Attend ALL club meetings every Thursday at 4:30pm
- Complete and submit all assignments required by Stockton Model UN Head Delegates and Faculty Advisor (e.g., position papers, country background worksheets, draft speeches)
- Attend and participate in ALL club events that semester
- Participate in ALL conference-related events during the conference (a no tolerance policy)
- Follow NMUN Rules
- Follow code of conduct and dress code as described in the NMUN Delegate Guide
- Abide by Stockton University’s Code of Conduct and Bias Free rules and regulations
Please email Dr. Tina Zappile (faculty advisor) at email@example.com with any questions!
How do we select the countries we represent?
Countries are assigned to schools based on a list of preferences and most importantly, size of delegation (or number of student delegates) attending a conference. Stockton's previous country assignments are located in the Awards & Conference Archives tab and show the diversity of countries we have represented. Typically we rotate our preferences for country assignments, moving to a different region and country each year and aiming for a balance of Western and non-Western countries.
The primary reason we frequently represent non-Western countries is that it provides the best learning opportunity for our students. We take our responsibility to accurately reflect the world system seriously, and do not make light of the positions and actions of the countries that we represent. For example, in the year our students were assigned to both North Korea and Luxembourg the training process involved a comparison of those two countries’ interests, positions, and proposed solutions for assigned topics. Further, our students met with representatives at the State Department in D.C. to learn about how that country behaves in diplomatic meetings with the U.S. and within the UN system. That team, and their training process, is a great example of why we often represent non-Western countries that fail to live up to the values of the UN system. Through that process, our students are forced to learn the policy preferences of a government that they disagree with, and then they have to figure out how to communicate those preferences and interests in their assigned UN committee. They learned firsthand how other countries pressure them to try to get them to change, and how treaties and agreements need to be designed in order to be more effective. It’s the other side of the coin, where our students get to learn exactly what the limits of global governance are when they represent a country that frequently violates human rights, degrades the environment, wages violent conflict, and more. It also demonstrates the reality of diplomacy, where the diplomats sometimes behave in some unexpected ways. Students from the U.S. and other Western countries often make assumptions about how leaders of non-Western countries behave, but actually representing them forces them to learn the realities of the world system for better and for worse. It also highlights the difference between a country’s government and their policies, versus the people living in the country. Part of learning about the world requires learning about authoritarian regimes and how they operate, to the detriment of their own people. It also requires learning about how diplomacy and global governance works, as a way to identify opportunities to make progress on human rights, development, and security (the 3 pillars of the UN system) when our students graduate.
It can be difficult to empathize with countries with positions that our students disagree with or would actually suffer harm from if they were living in there. Empathy does not mean to side with leaders of these countries, but instead to understand their positions and their perspective. There is a huge difference between the two, and we are very careful to identify that boundary. In the world system, understanding the other side can lead to better outcomes with the possibility of avoiding war as a way to resolve disputes between countries.
Our student leaders are skilled in providing our delegates with opportunities to work through some of the personal issues they might face in representing a country whose views and behaviors contradict their personal values and are a threat to them. We address this explicitly at club meetings as part of our training, and we have a lot of experience doing this.
As the faculty leader for Model UN at Stockton, it is my hope that representing a variety of countries teaches students the realities of the world system so that they can work towards a better future.
-Dr. Tina Zappile